FRCPath Haem Part 1 MCQs-Haemostasis 469
- amirhayat2527
- 10 minutes ago
- 1 min read

A 76-year-old woman presents with spontaneous extensive bruising, painful swelling of the right thigh, and persistent epistaxis. She has a history of rheumatoid arthritis and hypertension but no previous bleeding disorder. Examination reveals large ecchymoses over the limbs and a tense right thigh suggestive of an intramuscular haematoma.
Initial laboratory investigations show:
Test | Result |
Hb | 84 g/L |
Platelets | 295 ×10⁹/L |
APTT | 96 seconds (reference 24–36) |
Mixing study | Fails to correct immediately and after incubation |
FVIII activity | <1 IU/dL |
Bethesda inhibitor titre | 82 BU |
She receives recombinant porcine FVIII initially, together with prednisolone and rituximab for inhibitor eradication.
The multidisciplinary team decides to commence emicizumab as prophylaxis while continuing immunosuppressive therapy.
Two weeks later she develops mild calf pain after prolonged immobility. Doppler ultrasound confirms a distal deep vein thrombosis. Laboratory testing shows:
APTT: 24 seconds
One-stage FVIII assay: 240 IU/dL
Chromogenic bovine FVIII assay: 5 IU/dL
D-dimer: Elevated
The haematology registrar is concerned that the laboratory findings appear contradictory and wonders whether emicizumab should be discontinued because of thrombosis.
Which ONE of the following statements is MOST accurate?
A. The normal APTT and markedly elevated one-stage FVIII assay indicate excessive FVIII replacement from emicizumab
B. Emicizumab neutralises the FVIII inhibitor, so the Bethesda inhibitor titre becomes unreliable after treatment begins.
C. The elevated one-stage FVIII assay is an artefact caused by emicizumab
D. Emicizumab therapy proves the drug is contraindicated in acquired haemophilia A and should never be restarted.
E. APTT remains the preferred assay for monitoring emicizumab dose adjustment because it reflects the drug's pharmacodynamic activity.



Comments